Friday, September 25, 2015

US welcomes Saudi Arabia’s leadership role on UNHRC advisory group

  • Avatar


    New Rule, no country can be on the UNHRC if that country denies women the right to drive a car. This whole thing is a joke. No country in the Middle East is worthy to be on that council. All have blood on their hands. Post Ottoman era has not been kind to tranquility. The maps will keep changing for years to come. Saudi Arabia has been the lynch pin fueling ALL that is bad with Sunni Islam today. It's no secret what they have been up to, using their enormous wealth to expand their version of Islam on a global scale. The chickens have come home to roost a million times over. Insane how the world looks the other way while Saudi Arabia has a record worthy of nothing but condemnation. They play the political game as good as their neighbor up north. And could match them dollar to dollar. Israel doesn't seem to be bothered with their good neighbor fueling the ever expanding Jihad nation. A interesting dance between two powerful tribes that claim to represent their religious cohorts across the globe. They view their role as divinely inspired as guardians of the sacred land. And of course, the good book each side claim came from the heavens. Be curious to see how much political capital Israel is willing expend to criticize the addition of Saudi Arab to this council. My guess, not a peep.


      • Avatar


        The UNHRC would be obsessed with Israel, regardless of who the policymakers are. So, it's actually in Israel's interests for it to be a rogues gallery. American voters, on the other hand, should be questioning the rectitude of their government's participation in such a farce.


          • Avatar


            I beg to differ. No one is safe if Wahhabi Sunni Islam continues it's death march across the Middle East. That includes Israel. Look around and see how the neighborhood is up in flames. The call for the jihadists to march to Mecca and Jerusalem might get louder as they expand south.



        Tuesday, September 22, 2015

        Republican candidate Carson says Muslims unfit to be US president



        Avatar
        • Profound ramifications for such a view. I guess that means Carson would be in favor of a religious litmus test? That means Romney and Sanders would not be allowed to run. Then again, guessing he wants to exclude only Muslims, not other religious groups? That translates into that ALL Muslim-Americans are second class citizens. That puts America in line with ISIS,Iran, Saudi Arabia, Israel and all the Middle Eastern countries where religious bigotry towards minority religions is state official practice. No surprise Carson's remarks would find support in these parts.
            • Avatar
              It's all about the President upholding the US Constitution period, not Islamic Sharia law, it quire simple you cannot do both.
              Now please do a little investigation as to why not.
                • Avatar
                  But by definition Islam believes all non-Muslims are inferior and less than second class. That is incompatible with the US and West's view of people and citizens.
                  So it would be having a member of a racist orginsation running an open society, Doesn't work.
                    • Avatar
                      If he goes after Muslims now, he may go after Jews next year. . .
                      • Avatar
                        Israel? Support in these parts?
                        • Avatar
                          no it does not translate that way, he is speaking of leadership, and it will be a long time before there is a muslim majority in the US, and it is because of their beliefs that they should be held accountable, they do see everyone else as beneath them, this is not for leadership of a multi-cultural nation as vast and as gullable as the US, they believe in sharia law which is opposing to any and all democratic principles, butt wipe